THOUGH crystal slippers, midnight deadlines, and a happy ending are still very much a part of this Cinderella, there's been a considered shift away from the full-scale, traditional panto treatment of the story.
Instead of grotesquely-guyed Dames who make the cross-dressing a source of innuendo-tinged humour, the sisters - played by women - are a pair of stuck-up bitches who both want to marry Baron Hardup for his title. Jeanie Fisher and Susy Kane still get to wear OTT frocks and look ridiculous, but their comedy - and their bullying of Cinders - is intended to be
closer to the camp malevolence of Cruella de Vil than in-yer-
face gallus panto.
Just how well that works depends on the age of the audience. Really young children won't necessarily appreciate the subtler word play, but they certainly won't mistake the nasty, threatening edge that creeps in when the sisters deliberately destroy Cinders's hopes of going to the ball. It's a grade A
boo-hiss moment. Which is where panto rushes in again!
Cheering and booing have been positively encouraged by Louise Beattie's chummy, chatty fairy godmother. She regularly bounces on, just to make sure we are au fait with the story so far, initiating a dialogue that is superbly fanned into all-out, lung-bursting participation by Keith Warwick as Button. This guy is absolutely the business; wee, wiry, marvellously outgoing, and sharp with the patter. He is the daft lad the audience adores. He still doesn't get the girl - Cinders (Alison Douglas) falls for a prince (Kieran Brown) whose court seems word-perfect in the Robbie Williams songbook!
So not totally a panto, but a classy rethink that retains a lot of the essential vitality, mayhem, and magic of that enduring genre.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article