TOMMY Graham, MP - ``What we want is stones for building houses'' - must be principal contender for the word-bite of the year award at the next Westminster boys' night out, although his utterance on the Stone of Scone really epitomises the simplistic way in which Labour, bold old and new, attempt to cynically dismiss the deepest aspirations of the Scottish people.
As a young schoolboy I attended a packed and emotional meeting in the former St Andrew's Halls, Glasgow, in 1951, which was being addressed by two of the people who had removed the Stone, and there was rapturous applause as the Saltire which had covered the stone was unfurled.
At that point the Stone had been hastily returned to London, as we understood at the time on the insistence of King George VI, who apparently saw its removal from Westminster Abbey as a dreadful omen for the House of Windsor.
There was no minimising or trivialising the Stone then, and it was only after the humiliation of its return to London that stories of forgeries and mocking songs such as The Wee Magic Stane began to appear.
The present Stone is a potent symbol of English claims to the domination of Scotland, although it is extremely unlikely that the patriotic Abbot and brothers at Scone would have handed over the symbol of Scottish nationhood to a detested and despised foreign invader.
Indeed there may be considerable truth in the claims that the iron rings on the Stone are due to the fact that it was the cesspit cover at the Abbey, and as an unforgiving republican and nationalist I freely confess to taking many moments of quiet delight at the poetic justice contained in the possibility that generations of English and British monarchs have been crowned while sitting on the medieval equivalent of a lavatory-pan lid.
Alan Clayton,
80 Garnie Avenue, Erskine.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article