THE Scottish Labour Party has been hit by a bombshell. It finds itself suffering in our latest System Three poll in the same way that it has been hit in the polls on a UK basis in recent weeks.
Yet, contrary to the UK picture, it shows that in any election context it is the SNP which is the prime beneficiary of Labour's difficulties, which have gone from bad to worse.
Despite the fact that the fieldwork for our poll was carried out before last week's Labour conference, the depth and speed of Labour's fall is almost unprecedented and leaves the party even less certain about its immediate future in office.
For the SNP to have drawn level with Labour in voting intentions for Westminster is a major boost to new SNP leader John Swinney.
Only last week, Scottish Secretary John Reid dismissed the SNP's challenge in the next UK General Election. Yet the reality is that the SNP is likely to be the party that takes the most votes, and possibly seats, from Labour when the country goes to the polls.
The SNP's obvious satisfaction in drawing level with Labour in the race for Westminster must be tempered by the effects of the first-past-the-post electoral system which will still be used for the next General Election.
Despite being level on vote share in our poll, the SNP could only expect to take 12 seats in total. Labour would still have 47. For 33% of the vote, the SNP would only have 17% of the seats whereas Labour would have, for the same proportion of votes, a massive 65% of the seats.
As a consequence, the electoral system provides the SNP with virtually no hope of capturing a majority of Westminster seats.
Yet such is Labour's fall in support that the Tories would recapture Ayr and Eastwood, despite a lower vote share in our poll than it received in the 1997 General Election.
Holyrood is a different matter altogether and, if the figures for Westminster make gloomy reading for Donald Dewar, then System Three's measurement of voting intentions for the Scottish Parliament are nothing short of disastrous.
Labour's share of 28% of the vote on the first ballot and 25% on the second ballot show a collapse in support that is deeply damaging and suggests just how much the Government has lost the confidence of many voters in the wake of the fuel tax crisis.
Even at the height of the poll tax crisis in 1989 and 1990, the Conservatives did not lose support in this manner in such a short period.
All of which seems to have principally benefited the SNP. There is some comfort too for the Liberal Democrats, whose UK conference seems to have shored up its support in Scotland.
For John Swinney, the first System Three poll of his leadership shows that his party would have a commanding block of 59 seats in the Scottish Parliament, including 52 constituency members.
On the basis of the 14-point lead on first ballot voting intentions, the SNP would topple 43 Labour seats, including six out of 10 Glasgow seats and all bar one in Edinburgh. Across the Central Belt, Labour seats would fall - from Greenock and Inverclyde to Kirkcaldy.
Glasgow would be the only city in Scotland to have any Labour seats at all. All of which would leave a rump of only 11 constituencies for a beleaguered Mr Dewar.
Even at the height of the SNP's lead in the polls in the summer of 1998, Labour was still breathing down its neck. This poll shows real daylight between the two for the first time.
It is, of course, only one poll. Yet it matches the downward trend in UK support for Labour but with the SNP benefiting rather than the Tories.
It is also part of a longer downward trend for Labour over the past six months. Even polls which are cautious in their measurement of SNP support have recently indicated a clear lead for the SNP in Scottish Parliament terms.
There is no doubt that Labour will fight back, and no doubt that this poll will be dismissed by Labour supporters because its fieldwork was completed before the end of their party conference.
Nevertheless, such has been the depth of the fall in one month across every poll that something has gone badly wrong for this Government.
Such is the discontent with Labour that it is difficult to see how it can turn this fall around in the short term. Despite NOP and Mori UK surveys showing some measure of Labour recovery over the last week, it perhaps makes an election in spring or early summer less likely.
In Scotland, the next Holyrood election is still over two-and-a-half years away. That is a much more significant time gap.
If Labour wins the next General Election, there may time to put its Scottish house in order, but there is the real danger now that a Conservative win at a UK level may result in further seeping away of Labour support to the SNP in Scotland.
The fuel crisis has brought to a head simmering discontent on a wider range of issues, to the point where Tony Blair's party is now being accused of the very things which in large measure saw voters desert the Conservatives three-and-a-half years ago.
A Government which is branded as out of touch and not listening is in severe danger of losing the trust of voters which, once lost, is not easily regained. What Labour must hope is that there is time to repair the damage before the next General Election.
q Malcolm Dickson is a politics lecturer at Strathclyde University
Projected gains
Based on the poll's findings, the SNP would be projected to gain the following directly-elected seats at the Scottish Parliament:
from Labour
Western Isles; Aberdeen North; Aberdeen Central; Dundee East; Dundee West; Stirling; Ochil; Dunfermline West; Kirkcaldy; Dumbarton; Greenock & Inverclyde; Renfrewshire West; Clydebank & Milngavie; Paisley North: Paisley South; Cunninghame North; Eastwood; Glasgow Maryhill; Glasgow Baillieston; Glasgow Kelvin; Glasgow Govan; Glasgow Pollok; Glasgow Cathcart; Cumbernauld & Kilsyth; Falkirk East; Hamilton North & Belshill; Motherwell & Wishaw; East Kilbride; Kilmarnock & Loudoun; Linlithgow; Livingston; Edinburgh North & Leith; Edinburgh East & Musselburgh; Edinburgh Central; Edinburgh Pentlands; Edinburgh South; Midlothian; Cunninghame South; Ayr; Carrick; Cumnock & Doon Valley; Clydesdale; Dumfries
from the Lib Dems
Ross, Skye & Inverness West; Gordon; Argyll & Bute
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article