EXCLUSIVE
Robin Hood and his Merry Men are more likely to have stolen from the rich to give to the poor of East Lothian or East Kilbride than the East Midlands - according to a controversial new history.
For author Stephen Knight claims the archetypal English anti-hero was, in fact, a very Scottish creation with striking similarities to our own champion of the oppressed - William Wallace.
In Rabbie Hood: The Development of the English Outlaw Myth in Scotland, he argues that the scourge of aristocratic travellers in Sherwood Forest was more like the chairman of a residents' association than a swashbuckling desperado before he was hijacked by medieval Scottish storytellers. Only then was he returned south having acquired the characteristic traits associated with the modern legend.
The author - Professor of English Literature at the University of Wales, Cardiff - said: ''In Scottish hands the figure of Robin Hood was re-formulated. The English hero was a man of deeds and good instincts who, in play-game and early ballad, represented the local community for collective activity like money gathering or in its resistance to outside intervention.
''In Scotland there were more urgent things for a popular hero to represent as his highest values and they included a sense of national identity and resistance to a usurping king, neither of which had been central nor even of importance to the original Robin Hood.
''The greater nobility and greater political weight of the figure was the mainspring of gentrification. This figure was returned to England where he became highly valuable in renaissance ideology.''
Professor Knight - who will deliver his thesis at a lecture at Edinburgh University today - claims parallels exist between Robin Hood and Scotland's national outlaw - The Wallace.
Both have an over-arching resistance to English imperialism and both share a noble death at the hands of their enemies, leaving an enduring and valued memory.
In literary accounts of the respective heroes there are more specific similarities. Both disguise themselves as potters to enter a town incognito, both save themselves from trouble by dressing as a woman with the help of a sympathetic old woman, both rob and kill travellers and both have a difficult encounter with the king.
Professor Knight said: ''It seems that, in so far as Rabbie Hood exists, he may well be a hybrid of The Wallace and Robin Hood, a nationally conscious gentleman outlaw, royally mistreated by the king of England, noble, resistant and heroic in life and death.''
Professor Knight claims there is a recurrent element of Scottish involvement in the Robin Hood tradition which has received virtually no attention because of his identification as English.
He claims the first three medieval chroniclers who refer to Robin Hood - Andrew Wyntoun in the 1420s, Walter Bower in the 1440s and John Major in 1521 - were all Scots.
He said: ''It has long been known that late medieval Scottish literary references to the English outlaw exist, and that Robin Hood activities took place in Scottish towns in the late middle ages.
''The role of Scots chroniclers in promulgating the English outlaw myth has been referred to by scholars, but these phenomena have not been considered in terms of their wider implications.
''Apart from the intrinsic interest and relative neglect of the topic of Rabbie Hood, another good reason to return to it is that the whole phenomenon of a Scottish version of Robin Hood can now be looked at in the light of recently developed knowledge and theorisation about how colonial cultures operate and interact with native traditions.''
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article