If, as he hopes he will, Andy Murray wins Wimbledon this summer, he will take home a cool $1.15m to add to the prestige of a first grand-slam title.
As Wimbledon yesterday announced its biggest percentage increase in prize money for nearly 20 years, including an almost Keynesian redistribution in favour of the early rounds, Murray was busy winning his first match at the ATP event in Barcelona.
The Scot's 6-3, 6-2 win over Sergiy Stakhovskiy of Ukraine was pleasingly trouble-free, sending him into the third round of a tournament where he had previously won just one match in three visits.
He will take on Dutchman Robin Haase or Santiago Giraldo of Spain tomorrow for a place in the last eight but it was his presence at a meeting with the Wimbledon chairman, Philip Brook, and the former British No.1 Tim Henman, in Indian Wells last month that is even more significant than his continued progress on clay.
At the request of the players, Brook and Henman met Murray and the rest of the world's top four, Novak Djokovic, Rafael Nadal and Roger Federer, with prize money the main topic on the agenda.
In the long run, it is the percentage of revenue given to the players – through prize money – that they want increased but for this year, a redistribution of the wealth will offer those players losing in the first round the biggest heart.
There had been mention of the word "strike" at the US Open last September but Murray and the leading players soon realised that fighting battles they can win is a far more attractive proposition.
Just under two weeks ago, Wimbledon officials were waiting anxiously for the French Open to announce its prize-money figures, and what they and Wimbledon have done has gone down well with Murray.
"This is something that the players wanted," Murray said yesterday. "It's been [talked about] in conversations for the last few months or even the last year. Hopefully, more of the Tour will be happy after this.
"A lot of the money that has come into tennis, where the prize money has improved, has been at the top end. We've spoken to the guys on the ATP board and the guys at the grand slams and many players. I'm glad it's happened and it's good progress."
At a press conference at Wimbledon yesterday, Brook said the All England Club was looking to "redress the balance" with its prize money, having taken a decision in 2006 to load the rewards in favour of the most successful players.
Now, Brook said, the club believes the rising costs of professional tennis mean it is necessary to give those losing in the early rounds, and in qualifying, a greater increase in prize money.
"If you look at what really, really drives the interests in tennis, and top tournaments such as Wimbledon, for sure it's about top players and top players being recognised for what they do on our courts," he said.
"Back in 2007 we took the view, and I think that was a view that was [also] held at the time elsewhere, that perhaps more needed to be done for the top players. I think we're now of the view that we need to redress the balance, which is what we've done."
Brook said he had been impressed with the attitude and professionalism of Murray and the top three.
"What we have in the top four players is a group of young men who are very responsible for all those around them," he said.
"What we heard was not a request for more money for them, but a recognition that this was an issue for the sport and that something needed to be done about it and they were there representing all the players on the tour in meeting with us."
For the record, first-round losers will now receive £14,500 – up 26.1% on 2011 – while the winner's cheque of £1.15m, is up by 4.5% on last year.
"I think anybody who is good enough in our sport to either come through qualifying or be a direct entry to our Championships, that is an achievement in itself," Brook said, rejecting criticism that Wimbledon is now rewarding failure. "Half the players do lose in the first round."
In the three years that Wimbledon has had a roof over Centre Court – at a cost of £80m – there has been virtually no rain in the fortnight of the Championships, as sod's aw would decree.
Perhaps officials know something forecasters don't, for it was also revealed yesterday that play on the outside courts will begin at 11.30am, in part to ensure that uncompleted matches are not held overnight.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article