Britain's Katie Swan saw her superb Australian Open campaign come to a disappointing end as she lost to Slovakia's Tereza Mihalikova in the final of the girls' singles.
Swan beat the top seed in the third round in Melbourne and saved three match points in an epic semi-final victory on Friday, where she struggled badly with cramp in a three-set match lasting more than two-and-a-half hours.
But the 15-year-old from Bristol, who is now based in Kansas, perhaps paid the price for those heroics in the final, losing 6-1, 6-4, in an hour and 29 minutes on Rod Laver Arena.
After losing the first set in comprehensive fashion in the windy conditions, Swan threatened to make a comeback when she saved two break points in the opening game of the second set and then broke serve on her way to a 3-0 lead.
However, she then left the court for a medical time-out and after returning with strapping on her right thigh, proceeded to lose the next five games in a row.
Swan saved two match points to force Mihalikova to serve for the match, but the unseeded 16-year-old held her nerve from 0-30 down to seal victory.
"I actually started to feel my groin at the middle of the first set and then it got worse and worse throughout," Swan said. "I decided at 1-0 when I changed ends I was going to have the trainer on no matter what. So we went off and I think it's a strain in my groin. It's unfortunate but not much I can do about it.
"I think I didn't have much time to recover from yesterday, so that's part of it."
Swan added: "It was tough the first set. I wasn't really playing my best. I was pretty nervous so I wasn't really on my game.
"But then the second set I told myself again I just had to keep fighting. If I didn't have this [injury] and I could move fully, I think I would have had a better chance of taking that set. But I was still pleased with the way I fought and saved two match points.
"It's been an amazing experience. Obviously my best tournament. I'm really pleased with the way I've been playing this week. I hope that there are a lot more tournaments like this for me."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article