The decision by the United States Tennis Association to extend the 2013 US Open to a third Monday has drawn criticism from the men's govening body, the Association of Tennis Professionals, who have called on Flushing Meadows organisers to fall into line with the three other grand slam tournaments.
Next year's men's singles final will be played on a Monday, allowing the players to have a day's rest after the semi-finals which have traditionally been played on "Super Saturday", along with the women's singles final.
The 2013 women's singles final will take place on the Sunday – the semi-finals will be on Friday as usual – which will bring to an end 30 years of the Super Saturday, although no decision has yet been taken on whether the change will be a permanent one.
"By modifying the schedule, the US Open has recognised the incredible physical demands of men's tennis," said the ATP in a statement. "However, the ATP and its players have made it clear that we do not support a Monday final. We strongly believe the US Open should keep a similar schedule to the other grand slams.
"It is unfortunate the US Open response did not reflect our views and the ATP and its players will continue to pursue this matter in discussions with the USTA."
Bad weather has wreaked havoc on the US Open schedule in recent years, the men's final, including this year's epic between Andy Murray and Novak Djokovic, having been pushed back to the Monday for each of the past five years.
The ATP also gave a lukewarm response to the USTA's announcement of a $4m rise in prize money for the tournament to a record $29.5m.
"The prize money increase announced by the US Open for 2013 is appreciated and, together with the 2012 increase, represents the largest increase by the US Open since the ATP Tour began in 1990," it said. "However, the ATP and its players have asked that the US Open fully recognise the fundamental role of the players in driving US Open revenues, which are the largest in our sport.
"The ATP, therefore, remains committed to continu-ing discussions on this issue, with the objective of ensuring that the players' share of the revenues at the US Open truly reflects the value that they generate for the event."
Players have complained about prize money for years, saying purses for the four grand slams were too small in relation to the revenue they brought in and too lop-sided in favour of the top players. The matter came to a head before this year's Australian Open although talk of a possible strike never came to fruition.
The decision by the United States Tennis Association to extend the 2013 US Open to a third Monday has drawn criticism from the men's govening body, the Association of Tennis Professionals, who have called on Flushing Meadows organisers to fall into line with the three other grand slam tournaments.
Next year's men's singles final will be played on a Monday, allowing the players to have a day's rest after the semi-finals which have traditionally been played on "Super Saturday", along with the women's singles final.
The 2013 women's singles final will take place on the Sunday – the semi-finals will be on Friday as usual – which will bring to an end 30 years of the Super Saturday, although no decision has yet been taken on whether the change will be a permanent one.
"By modifying the schedule, the US Open has recognised the incredible physical demands of men's tennis," said the ATP in a statement. "However, the ATP and its players have made it clear that we do not support a Monday final. We strongly believe the US Open should keep a similar schedule to the other grand slams.
"It is unfortunate the US Open response did not reflect our views and the ATP and its players will continue to pursue this matter in discussions with the USTA."
Bad weather has wreaked havoc on the US Open schedule in recent years, the men's final, including this year's epic between Andy Murray and Novak Djokovic, having been pushed back to the Monday for each of the past five years.
The ATP also gave a lukewarm response to the USTA's announcement of a $4m rise in prize money for the tournament to a record $29.5m.
"The prize money increase announced by the US Open for 2013 is appreciated and, together with the 2012 increase, represents the largest increase by the US Open since the ATP Tour began in 1990," it said. "However, the ATP and its players have asked that the US Open fully recognise the fundamental role of the players in driving US Open revenues, which are the largest in our sport.
"The ATP, therefore, remains committed to continu-ing discussions on this issue, with the objective of ensuring that the players' share of the revenues at the US Open truly reflects the value that they generate for the event."
Players have complained about prize money for years, saying purses for the four grand slams were too small in relation to the revenue they brought in and too lop-sided in favour of the top players. The matter came to a head before this year's Australian Open although talk of a possible strike never came to fruition.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article