Andy Murray may have a long way to go to fulfil his dream of becoming world No 1 but when he arrives in the Californian desert today, he knows that over the next month he has a great chance to pick off one of the men standing between him and the top and make inroads towards the other.
Having lost his first match in the BNP Paribas Open last year (and the year before, for that matter), should Murray win the title in Indian Wells a fortnight today, he will overtake Roger Federer to become No 2, leaving only Novak Djokovic ahead of him.
Getting closer to Djokovic will probably require a good performance in Miami, where he reached the final last year, strong showings at the three clay-court Masters 1000s and, more than likely, another Grand Slam. No easy task, then.
But the chance to overtake Federer, the man he beat in the semi-finals of the Australian Open in January, should erode any thoughts of a third straight early defeat in Indian Wells, an event in which he had performed well until 2011.
Those two early losses came soon after heart-breaking defeats in Australian Open finals. It could be argued that having lost again in the Melbourne final this year, again to Djokovic, another slump could be on the cards. But Murray's victory at the US Open last September means he sees near misses rather differently now.
By the time he plays his second-round match in Indian Wells next weekend – the top seeds all get byes through round one – it will be almost six weeks since the defeat by Djokovic. In that time, he managed to pay a quick visit home, fulfil a round of press commitments for this summer's Aegon Championships, agree to play in a summer exhibition in aid of cancer research, be nominated for a Laureus Sports award and buy himself a five-star hotel in Scotland.
It is the first time Murray has taken an extended break, through choice, in February but along with the off-court dealings, the 26-year-old felt the extra time on court with coach Ivan Lendl was worth sacrificing potentially big pay-days in Rotterdam and Dubai. Murray and Lendl have been working together in Florida for the past three weeks, hoping the extra training block and time together will pay dividends.
Once in Indian Wells, Lendl will doubtless find time to play plenty of golf but Murray's focus will be on the court and overtaking Federer to equal his career-high ranking, last achieved in August 2009. For the past few years, the stability of the top four – Djokovic, Federer, Murray and Rafael Nadal in various orders – has meant the main talking point when it came to the draw was whose half each was in. But Nadal's seven-month absence from the Tour, which ended last month, saw him slip to No 5 behind David Ferrer. If Nadal does play in Indian Wells – and it remains a 50-50 decision as he nurses his recovering knee – he could play any of the top four in the quarter-finals, making things even more difficult for everyone concerned.
With Ross Hutchins having treatment for Hodgkin's Lymphoma and Jonny Marray recovering from hernia surgery, British interest in the doubles will focus on Scotland's Colin Fleming, who partners Australia's Paul Hanley.
But Britain's women will also be represented by Heather Watson and Laura Robson, each of whom will be looking to push their career-high rankings even further over the next month. At No 39, Watson is four places higher than Robson, who says she has shaken off a chest infection that has bothered her for the past six months.
"Hopefully everything has cleared up," she said. "I've seen a specialist and I've taken yet another course of antibiotics. I'm feeling pretty good and I've practised well the last couple of days. Hopefully [the doctors] got to the bottom of it."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article