All England Club chief executive Richard Lewis tonight stood by the quality of the Wimbledon grass on a day when seven singles players withdrew from the championships due to a range of injuries.
All England Club chief executive Richard Lewis tonight stood by the quality of the Wimbledon grass on a day when seven singles players withdrew from the championships due to a range of injuries.
From the moment Steve Darcis withdrew prior to his second-round clash because of a shoulder problem, the talk around Wimbledon was about the condition of the courts and whether they were dangerous.
That seemed to be the view of Maria Sharapova as she fell to a surprise defeat against Michelle Larcher de Brito, with lip readers picking up her saying "This court is dangerous", a quote she did not later deny.
Former professionals including Boris Becker and Tim Henman had their say in response, claiming the courts were fine, and Lewis did the same.
In a statement released by the club, Lewis said: "There has been a high number of withdrawals at the championships today and we sympathise with all the players affected.
"The withdrawals have occurred for a variety of reasons, but there have been some suggestion that the court surface is to blame. We have no reason to think this is the case."
The All England Club has a new head groundsman for this tournament, with Neil Stubley, who has spent many years on the staff, having succeeded Eddie Seaward.
There is no suggestion that the quality of surface has dropped, though, according to Lewis.
He added: "Many players have complimented us on the very good condition of the courts.
"The court preparation has been to exactly the same meticulous standard as in previous years and it is well known that grass surfaces tend to be more lush at the start of an event.
"The factual evidence, which is independently checked, is that the courts are almost identical to last year, as dry and firm as they should be, and we expect them to continue to play to their usual high quality."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article