Scotland would have entirely free public transport under plans being put forward at the Holyrood election by the Scottish Socialist Party.
The far-left group, which has four MSPs, reckons the bill would be less than £1bn per year to pay the fares for everyone using rail, bus and ferries in Scotland, including the increased demand for travel that would result from the removal of fares.
They also believe savings elsewhere could cover the cost of nationalising all public services, including railways, Stagecoach and First Bus.
The audacious, eye-catching idea is set to play a central part in the party's campaign, with a pitch to make Scotland the first in the world to make public transport free, taking a lead in reduction of climate-change pollution.
Its reckoning is the cost would be partly covered by the reduced cost of accidents in private cars and of lower road-maintenance costs, together coming to "anything between £300m and £500m". The economy would be boosted by people spending their bus and train fares on other goods and services, helping a million workers each re-direct between £40 and £100 per month.
Businesses could be saved as much as £1bn per year from reduced road congestion, the party claims. Tourism would be boosted and there would be lower demands for oil imports.
According to one leading transport expert, it would require a doubling of the number of people travelling by rail to reduce vehicle miles on the roads by as little as 5%.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article