More Than parent RSA Insurance said "aggressive" rate cuts in the motor cover market saw its UK business come under further pressure in the first three months of the year.
Growth in UK net written premiums ground to a halt in the quarter to March 31, at £726 million against £725 million a year earlier, after a 4% slide in RSA's motor insurance arm.
The group has been reducing its exposure to the highly competitive UK motor market and prioritising profit over sales volumes, but said industry-wide moves to slash rates continued to make it a "challenging market".
It said new business volumes had stabilised for motor insurance, following a 19% plunge in 2012, but the group still increased rates - 4% higher year-on-year in March against rises of 10% in December.
The pressure in its motor market offset progress on household insurance and pet cover, where premiums rose 1% and 5% respectively. Commercial premiums also remained flat at £396 million.
RSA disappointed investors earlier this year when it slashed its full-year dividend by a third after a 6% fall in annual operating profits to £684 million after taking a hit on last summer's UK floods and two earthquakes in Italy.
UK premiums rose 2% to £3 billion last year, but underwriting profits were £39 million against £62 million a year earlier, primarily due to the impact of weather in the first half
But the group sought to assure it had made an "encouraging" start to the year thanks to a better performance from its overseas markets.
RSA, which employs 23,000 staff worldwide, said total group premiums rose 5% at constant exchange rates to £2.3 billion after an 18% leap in Canada and a 16% hike in emerging markets including Asia and Latin America.
Its Scandinavian business also reported a 4% rise in premiums.
Nick Johnson, an analyst at Numis Securities, said RSA delivered a "solid update" overall despite the UK pressures.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article