The Missing Shade Of Blue, subtitled A Philosophical Adventure, is an exploration in the form of a novel of the problem posed by the empirical philosopher David Hume.
Despite his premise that knowledge is derived from sensory experience, he conceded that someone who had seen every colour except one particular shade of blue could conjure up a clear image of that shade from the knowledge of all other shades of blue.
This is something Edgar Logan has puzzled over since his Parisian childhood, when his Scots father turned it into a bedtime story. In Edinburgh to translate Hume's essays into French from the original manuscripts, he is the narrator and one of the three characters around whom the novel is woven.
Edgar's friendship with Harry Sanderson, a philosophy teacher who has become deeply disenchanted with his subject and his much younger wife, Carrie, provides a prism through which Edgar comes to view not only their relationship but the nature of love, which he has so far found only in the pages of novels. Constructing a work of fiction on a philosophical question is a risky enterprise. Ensuring the philosophical dimension remains a vehicle for the literary one requires convincing and evolving characters. Erdal succeeds in this despite giving Edgar a naivety that is difficult to reconcile with his 45 years. The backstory of his childhood in a Paris bookshop, full of family sadnesses, however, provides an explanation for his reclusive nature.
The character of Sanderson dominates with a thrawn contrariness instantly recognisable as a besetting characteristic of generations of Scots. He is a complex creation, whose "iron features, cast in a foundry" belie an inner turmoil. A skin problem, which worsens as the book progresses, simultaneously repels us and attracts our sympathy. It provides a memorable vignette when, conscious of how repugnant it has become, he carries out the physical doctoring of his blistered skin in his office instead of at home and is found by Edgar with his trousers rolled up and his feet encased in polythene bags after he has dipped them in olive oil.
As his skin is ravaged by disease, his mental health is also unravelled by jealousy and despair. The reader is drawn into this process through Edgar's horrified observation of it and Sanderson's moments of lucid self-knowledge. In reflecting on his father's life, for example, Sanderson concedes: "Maybe my father was wiser than Socrates. He worked, he went fishing and he tended his garden." Fishing is important. It is in the contrast between Sanderson's crass fulminating against the modern world and his dextrous fly-tying (in which he delights as a privileged link to an ancient art) that we see how his finer qualities have been submerged by disappointment and feelings of failure.
He is linked just as directly to Hume, who suffered a mental breakdown his doctor termed "the disease of the learned". Where Hume found a remedy in a daily walk, Sanderson finds balm in the perfect casting of a fly into a river and Erdel a metaphor for human behaviour and the setting for a pivotal moment of dramatic tension.
A theme running through this book is what it means to be fully human, something that exercised Hume. For Erdal, the human condition is often absurd. With a shrewd sense of pretentiousness she lightens what occasionally threatens to be a dismal exploration of dark emotions with comic incidents.
This is a debut novel for Jennie Erdal but, as she recounted amusingly and to critical acclaim in her fictionalised memoir, Ghosting, she has written a variety of work including two novels credited to the publisher Naim Attallah. In setting her diffident narrator on his philosophical adventure, she has bravely stretched a difficult idea to its limit and proved herself a serious writer.
The Missing Shade Of Blue
Jennie Erdal, Abacus, £12.99
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article