Romeo and Juliet
Festival Theatre, Edinburgh
Mary Brennan
FIVE STARS
Long after the star-crossed lovers have mouldered into dust, Friar Lawrence is still anguished by his own part in the tragedy. It's his daily penance of remembering that is the framework for Jean-Christophe Maillot's Romeo and Juliet - given its UK premiere last week by Northern Ballet. The Friar (a lean, lithely-wrenching Isaac Lee-Baker) recalls people, and events, not the backdrop of buildings or the pomp and pageantry of vendetta between Capulet and Montague, and so Maillot sets his vividly expressive choreography in a minimalist white space - colour washes filter in mood shifts, curved flats occasionally move across stage like a filmic screen-wipe. No place or time-period is imposed here. Sword fighting-by-numbers? Out, along with market-place clutter: his ballet is focussed, with a consummate degree of physical and emotional detail, on hot-blooded, hot-headed youth - and because it is so unburdened by design, the movement has room to breathe dynamic life into a familiar story.
Juliet (Martha Leebolt, eagerly on the cusp of womanhood) is allowed to be bold: she simply pounces on Romeo (Giuliano Contadini, a carefree boy ambushed by love, rather than adolescent lust) so that frisky flirtation morphs into the compelling passion implicit in the Prokofiev score. As for Mercutio (Matthew Koon) and his best mate Benvolio (Sean Bates) - Maillot gives them larky-laddish footwork, nippy and nimble and all the more technically demanding because of it. They both strut the stuff of teen spirit brilliantly until a silly scuffle turns vicious... We know how it ends, but Maillot's flair for creating believable characters through seemingly spontaneous movement really makes us care. Like Friar Lawrence, we'll remember this Romeo and Juliet, albeit for more tender reasons.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article