TV star Mark Gatiss has told how he based his Sherlock alter-ego Mycroft on Peter Mandelson.
The actor and writer plays the politician, who was one of the key architects behind New Labour, in new Channel 4 drama Coalition.
But Gatiss said that his depiction of Mycroft - the older brother of Benedict Cumberbatch's detective in the TV series which he co-created with Steven Moffat - was already inspired by Mandelson.
"I based Mycroft on Peter Mandelson. It was explicit even before I was going to play him," the actor told Radio Times magazine.
"Steven... and I talked about how Mandelsonian Mycroft was... Conan Doyle says Mycroft is the British government. He's the power behind the throne."
Gatiss also complained that there was a "massive satire gap" on British TV screens.
"John Cleese said satire is only possible under a really horrible Conservative government, which is what we have.
"There should be some very young people doing blistering satire - especially when you have people like Nigel Farage, who you could easily portray as Zippy, or Mr Toad, which is exactly who he is, come to think of it," he said.
"It would need to be a really vicious satire - and I'm too old."
He said of Coalition, which looks at the formation of the current government: "It's something we're going to be encountering very soon again.
"We'll have a minority Tory or a Labour/SNP government. But the world will be thinking, 'That's not stable.' And business confidence will leach away.
"As a politics junkie it's incredibly exciting, but the next election is also terrifying. It would be horrific if the only time the public don't change their mind on a by-election winning party is with Ukip."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article