Behaviour
Early Days (of a better nation)
Arches, Glasgow
Mary Brennan
FOUR STARS
Civil war has left the fabric of Dacia in ruins: we, the people of the City, the Plains and the Islands are now tasked with shaping its future. It sounds like a board game, but in the Arches it becomes a fascinating piece of immersive theatre where the audience drives the show, voting on crucial issues, electing representatives and generally role-playing as if they had a nation's limited budget, and not the weekly house-keeping, to provide power, food and health-care. It turns out most of our assembly wouldn't spend a Dacian bawbee on law and order.
It all gets very heated, very quickly. Coney, the company who created the touring project, are well prepared for this and for the odd-ball variables that play out. Our Islands, for instance, advocate a women-only council - men can only be heard if they pass the Beyonce lyrics test. Would this work for Dacia? Or should Dacia take up the World Council's offer of aid and "peace-keeping forces"? We're kept abreast of what the exuberant shouting matches are debating and deciding by on-the-spot news reporter Dominic Garfield, whose quick-witted resumes - along with rapid responses by writer Tom Bowtell and director Annette Moss - nudge things along without dictating outcomes. Maybe last year's Scottish referendum and the forthcoming General Election are spurs to serious (and cynical or spoofing) reflections on the workings and priorities of a democracy - not least when the interests of very separate regions are involved - but what Early Days does is remind us that we, and not just the politicians, are all accountable for our future. Never mind Russell Brand interviews, get the politicos to take Coney's Early Days challenge.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article