Verdict: three stars
Brentano Quartet
Kilrenny Church, Fife
It feels a bit churlish to complain when a sound is too beautiful, too consistent, too polished. Classical musicians spend decades honing techniques to achieve exactly these qualities, then we turn around and demand something rough, uneven, unpredictable, plain ugly? Well, yes, sometimes.
Or rather, it's the music that makes the demands.
Benjamin Britten composed his third and last string quartet at the end of his life, some of it during his final troubled visit to Venice in 1975. There is beauty and evanescence in the piece, but also anger and pain.
Themes from his harrowing opera Death in Venice haunt the score. In a persuasive performance, the sorrow of the Passacaglia should be hard to bear. Mendelssohn's First Quartet, meanwhile, is all glowing bravado, penned by a 20-year-old whose mind was too agile and exploratory to rein anything in.
The Brentano Quartet, a venerable American ensemble currently resident at Yale University, makes a beautiful sound.
The ensemble playing is tasteful, judiciously balanced, well-schooled with all the correct allocations of loud and soft, legato and crisp, fiery and contemplative.
There were some very classy moments in this East Neuk Festival recital: the solemnly inquisitive pizzicatos in the last movement of the Britten, for example, or the carefully balanced lyricism in the Mendelssohn's middle movements, or even the bright, zippy energy whipped up in the Mendelssohn's finale.
The problem was that the same glossy approach applied to both works, and as a result the character of each was flattened out. The Brentano Britten was dignified but hardly hinted at desolation. The Brentano Mendelssohn was elegant and polite, but never properly feisty. It was all a lovely sound, but a little too much of a good thing.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article