Festival Music
Stephen Hough
Queen’s Hall, Edinburgh
Michael Tumelty
five stars
I DIDN’T stop thinking for one minute yesterday on the way back to Glasgow from Stephen Hough’s extraordinary recital at the Queen’s Hall. Indeed, so preoccupied was I with sorting out what we had just heard that I can’t actually remember the journey.
I don’t know how long it is since Hough graced the boards in this neck of the woods, but it’s too long. The man is an intellectual and physical pianistic powerhouse. He raises more issues and questions per piece than almost any other pianist I know. He flings out challenges to preconceptions. And he educates with every phrase.
Yesterday’s major point of enlightenment (and challenge) came in a gloriously decisive, dramatic and tender account of Schubert’s D784 A minor Sonata. I could not believe the pluralistic insights that flowed from Hough’s mind and fingers throughout the piece. Was it bleak? Was it dramatic? Was it tenderly lyrical? Was it emotionally elusive? Was it explosive? Was it subtle? It was all of these things and more in Hough’s mesmerising probe into the heart and soul of the sonata. What we were hearing, in effect, was a masterclass in musical analysis and perception.
And on it rolled, through Hough’s sonorous account of Franck’s Prelude, Choral and Fugue, which suddenly had wings instead of lead in its boots, through Hough’s own sonata, Trinitas, whose music rose above its serial-technique methods of construction, and a delicious concoction from Liszt’s Walses Oubliees and Transcendental Studies. Oh, and that genius Hough has a wicked sense of humour, on full display as he paraded “Matilda’s Rumba” as an encore: “the most vulgar piece I’ve ever written,” he quipped later.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here