Jamp
A few years ago I visited a school in Inverness to talk about Scots and English. “I hope you’re going to tell them off about ‘jamp’,” said the teacher sternly, as we walked down the corridor. It turned out that the children were using the word as a past tense of “jump”. I’m sorry to say that – feeling a trifle impish that day-- I proceeded to write the word on the board, and the schoolchildren all cheered. I’m not sure I was good for discipline.
There is nothing odd about verbs developing what linguists call both “strong” and “weak” forms; we might compare British “dived” (a so-called weak form, with a final “d” to indicate past tense) and US “dove” (a strong form, with a change in the vowel). For some reason I’d not come across jamp until that day.
I was very excited: a new form! But I should have restrained my excitement, since I met it again a couple of weeks later, in Kirkcudbright. Jamp had clearly gone viral in Scotland’s schools. Or so I thought.
Of course the Dictionary of the Scots Language (www.dsl.ac.uk) put me right: jamp is not as new as all that. It is recorded as a past tense of jimp “jump” as far back as the beginning of the nineteenth century.
How jimp got its vowel is according to DSL “obscure”, though there’s a common strong verb pattern that gives us sing (past sang), sit (past sat) etc, with which jimp/jamp would align.
There is even a charming halfwayhouse form jampt, but that form isn’t new either; DSL has a Renfrewshire record from 1853.
Scots Word of the Week is written by Pauline Cairns Speitel of Scottish Language Dictionaries located at 9 Coates Crescent, Edinburgh.
Visit their website at www.scotsdictionaries.org.uk
You can also contact them by email at mail@scotsdictionaries.org.uk.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article