Opera
Eugene Onegin
Theatre Royal, Glasgow
Keith Bruce
four stars
DEFECATION, bare buttocks and ballet: Scottish Opera’s new production of Tchaikovsky’s best-loved opera is nothing if not attention-grabbing at the beginning of each of its three acts.
The first of these was the only unscheduled event in Oliver Mears’s startling staging, the new director of the Royal Opera House fulfilling a commitment made before his appointment to the Covent Garden job. Evidently stage struck, George the horse, on whose back Onegin makes his entrance copiously manured the carpet of Tatyana’s country house, an eventuality clearly foreseen by the efficiency with which it was dealt.
As well as his equestrian skills, Australian baritone Samuel Dale Johnson is later required to appear naked in the bath, in a performance that transcends such distractions by being beautifully measured and characterful as well as excellently sung.
The ballet comes in the equally eloquent form of former Scottish Ballet star Eve Mutso, choreographed by her artistic director there, Ashley Page, by which time such a potentially surprising ingredient hardly seems remarkable at all. Mears supplies the production with a mesmerising sequence of stage pictures, tableaux involving the chorus in silhouette, and weather battering the stage-height shutters. This Onegin is a highly eventful 200 minutes, which is both a strength and a weakness.
With her story framed in mind of her silent older self (Rosy Sanders), Welsh soprano Natalya Romaniw is a wonderful Tatyana, and once again the company has assembled a cast that is superb right across the board, while the chorus sing and move with great skill and Stuart Stratford directs an orchestra in top form in the pit.
If this was to be your introduction to the possibilities of staged opera, it is assuredly a night you are not likely to forget in a hurry, but if you treasure any sense of Tchaikovsky’s adaptation of Pushkin’s story as an intimate chamber piece – as it can also so successfully be done – you might possibly find this production all just a bit rich.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article