Hollywood’s biggest night has been plagued by controversy this year.
It will be the first time in 30 years that the Oscars ceremony has gone ahead without a host, after the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences’ pick, Kevin Hart, stepped down following a row over homophobic tweets.
Instead, star presenters including Daniel Craig, Jennifer Lopez and Chadwick Boseman will be relied upon to keep the proceedings moving along, while the best picture nominees will be introduced by famous faces such as Serena Williams, Mike Myers and Barbra Streisand.
But the drama surrounding Hart is just one of a string of reversals and rows that have dogged the 91st ceremony, as the Academy seeks to cut the ceremony down to three hours from almost four in 2018 and claw back declining viewing figures by appealing to a younger audience.
Ratings for last year’s telecast fell to an all-time low of 26.5 million viewers in the US, almost 20% down from the previous year.
In August 2018 it was confirmed that a new category was being designed around achievement in popular film, which swiftly drew criticism from industry experts and actors, including Rob Lowe.
The West Wing star said: “The film business passed away today with the announcement of the ‘popular’ film Oscar.
“It had been in poor health for a number of years. It is survived by sequels, tent-poles, and vertical integration.”
Just weeks later it was announced that the introduction of the new category was being “postponed”.
More recently the Academy sparked ire from top film-makers including Martin Scorsese, Quentin Tarantino and nominee Spike Lee after it announced plans to present four awards during advert breaks, also in an effort to trim the running time.
The decision to hand out the Oscars for live-action shorts, make-up and hairstyling, cinematography and editing during breaks in the telecast, a time when members of the audience in the Dolby Theatre habitually make trips to the bar or the toilet, sparked an outcry and accusations that the Academy was disrespecting workers in those disciplines.
The Academy responded by saying the winners’ speeches would be shown later in the broadcast, adding that no award category would be “presented in a manner that depicts the achievements of its nominees and winners as less than any others”.
But this did not calm the furore and eventually the Academy announced that it was reversing the decision and that all 24 categories would be presented during the live broadcast, which will ensure it exceeds the intended three-hour running time.
There was also an outcry after it was reported that only two out of the five nominees for best original song would be performed.
It had been claimed that only Lady Gaga and Kendrick Lamar and SZA would be given slots to perform their nominated songs Shallow from A Star Is Born and All The Stars from Black Panther.
That decision was widely criticised, notably by Hamilton creator and Mary Poppins Returns star Lin-Manuel Miranda.
The Academy apparently quickly changed course and it has since been confirmed that all five nominated songs will be performed, including The Place Where Lost Things Go from Mary Poppins Returns, I’ll Fight from RBG and When A Cowboy Trades His Spurs For Wings from The Ballad Of Buster Scruggs.
However, just days before the ceremony it was reported that Lamar and SZA will not perform their song, due to “logistics and timing”.
The 91st Academy Awards will be handed out at the Dolby Theatre in Los Angeles on February 24.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article