Theatre
Heart of Darkness
Tron, Glasgow
Mary Brennan
***
OVER a century after it was first published, Joseph Conrad’s novella, Heart of Darkness, refuses to gather quiet dust. Hailed as one of the greatest texts of Western literature by some and more recently as offensive and deplorable by Nigerian novelist Chinua Achebe and others, Conrad’s denunciation of Belgium’s colonial exploitation of the Congo also reflected the racist tropes and dehumanising prejudices that were current at the time. David Lammy’s recent condemnation of Comic Relief’s use of ‘white saviours’ to raise funds for communities in Africa is proof that old wounds haven’t healed.
Enter those resolutely disruptive theatre-makers, Imitating the Dog, with what they categorise as a re-telling of Conrad’s classic for today. It’s more like a provocative upheaval, actually. The original concept is reversed: instead of a white man, Marlow, travelling deep into the Congo to find the megalomaniac Kurtz, we have a Congolese woman, a detective, journeying through a war-torn Europe in search of a Kurtz now lording it over slave labour in derelict England.
Writers and directors Andrew Quick and Pete Brooks discard any attempt at an exact narrative fit, in favour of intercutting live video with film footage - clips from Apocalypse Now! recycle the theme of imperialism gone rogue - while, from time to time, the cast gather together to discuss ideas, clarify what they want to explore in terms of Empire-building, ‘civilisation’, moral authority and the lingering legacy of Europe’s conduct in Africa.
Across some two hours, we witness a collage of images and episodes that range from an 1970s television interview with the former commandant of Treblinka concentration camp to Marlow (Keicha Greenidge) encountering a similar self-justification and disregard for ‘others’ when she finally finds Kurtz.
Along the way, the cast of five ensure that no easy answers slip through the mesh of unsettling questions - Heart of Darkness still beats with insistent challenges.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here