Theatre
Romeo and Juliet
Theatre Royal, Glasgow
Neil Cooper
Four stars
EVERYTHING is council estate grey in Erica Whyman’s streetwise Royal Shakespeare Company revival of Shakespeare’s teenage gang-based tragedy, in Glasgow for the final leg of its UK tour. The brutalist steel and breezeblock backdrop of Tom Piper’s set lends the play a contemporary harshness heightened even more by the babble of criss-crossing young voices who stab out the play’s prologue like a weapon.
Once things calm down, we move downtown, where, on the frontline, the Capulets and the Montagues’ unspecified beef has become a hand-me-down accessory for local youth in search of a sense of belonging and a cause to call their own, however misguided they may be in their bid to join the grown-ups.
It’s this adolescent craving for attention and to be taken seriously that fires the play here, with inter-gang bantz led by Charlotte Josephine’s motor-mouthed Mercutio as he, Benvolio and Afolabi Alli’s matinee idol Romeo attempt to crash the Capulets’ big party and get down with the cool kids. What happens next should have been the love affair of the century, but ends in tears and a community torn apart.
Beyond the brat-pack, whose numbers are fleshed out by eight performers from local schools, Ishia Bennison’s Nurse possesses the comic warmth of an old-school club turn, while Andrew French’s Friar Laurence resembles a trendy vicar getting down with the kids.
Set to Sophie Cotton’s low-key string-based score peppered with occasional smatterings of dubstep and, at one point, a live grunge band, shadows of latter-day stabbings hang over Whyman’s production like a Stanley knife. As the dressed down ensemble spar their way towards the inevitable, the ghosts of the dead occasionally appear atop the grey cube that doubles up as Juliet’s balcony like civic art monuments.
It is here that the play’s most intimate moments occur beneath Charles Balfour’s increasingly brooding lighting. Karen Fishwick makes a wonderful Juliet as she moves from lovesick teen to real life adult, with all the matters of life and death that entails in this vigorous youthquake of a show.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here