Theatre
Glengarry Glen Ross
Theatre Royal, Glasgow
Neil Cooper
****
DON’T be fooled by the implied panoramas in the title of David Mamet’s 1983 play, revived by director Sam Yates for this recast touring version following its West End success. Like everything else in Mamet’s brutal dissection of everyday capitalism at its most hysteria-driven, the wide-open idyll the phrase conjures up is a con designed to lure in the gullible, for whom such aspirations are a lifestyle choice.
By rights, Mamet’s portrait of toxic masculinity among the property-selling classes should be as old hat as the casual racism, big suits and even bigger talk sported by Mark Benton’s over the hill Shelley Levene and Nigel Harman’s relentless hustler Ricky Roma.
Tethered to a fiercely competitive office environment and without a woman in sight or even referred to, they are hyped-up, testosterone-driven, status-chasing sharks who would trample each other into the crumbling foundations of everything they stand for to get ahead.
Such high-rolling posturing is but a symptom, alas, of a culture that brayed its way towards where we are now. In this way, looking at the play today is like jumping into a time capsule to revisit the ghosts of economic disasters past. With the first act introducing us to the play’s six principal players through a series of duologues exchanged like bullets on designer Chiara Stephenson’s gaudy Chinese restaurant set, it’s not difficult to read the office break-in that drives the second half as a metaphor for impending financial collapse.
Roma is a pre-Trumpian shyster with a flint-eyed intelligence to go with the slimeball theatrics, both played to the max by Harman. As Levene, rather than playing him as a sad sack, Benton carries a bull in a china shop’s sense of last-gasp desperation. There are points where his pugnaciousness can’t help but resemble Tory terrier Mark Francois.
This is a two-fisted portent of the shape of things to come in a world where you can only hustle so much before you get caught.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here