Jed Mercurio has said he has always known who “H” is in Line Of Duty – but is open to changing the ending of the police drama.
The identity of the character is yet to be revealed in the first two episodes of series five, which has been the most-watched show of 2019 so far.
The show’s creator told the BFI & Radio Times Television Festival: “I suppose if I had an idea later on that was even better then, yeah, of course I would change it.
“Because you want it to be as good as possible and surprising and so forth.”
Mercurio, who also created Bodyguard, said he deliberately used names that could be turned into H, creating a series of red herrings in the show.
“Sometimes there were characters whose name could be corrupted or nicknamed into being an ‘H’ if I wanted to,” he said.
“Some of the characters were given names where they could have been revealed as having an ‘H’ connection if it was required.”
Viewers are hoping to find out the identity of H in the current series, with many speculating it could be Superintendent Ted Hastings – the head of anti-corruption unit AC-12.
The police drama, which first aired in 2012, has been commissioned for another series, but Mercurio admitted that he has not started writing it yet.
“We are not going into straight into series six, we don’t shoot them back to back,” he said.
“What we have always done, even though we’ve had two series commissioned, three and four, four and five, it’s helpful to the process that we are allowed time for the series to go out.
“Then we can take stock of audience reaction and that’s really helpful to us, the stories have resonated.
“Those help us plan ahead but we’re going to take stock after series five.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article