Leonardo da Vinci may have been prevented from finishing the Mona Lisa after a severe fainting episode left him with a “claw” hand and unable to hold a paintbrush, a new study suggests.
A portrait of the Italian Renaissance artist shows his right hand, wrapped in clothing like a bandage and “suspended in a stiff, contracted position”, according to research published in the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.
Although da Vinci drew with his left hand, the researchers said he painted with his right and they believe the injury may have forced him to leave many works incomplete.
It has previously been suggested that the artist suffered a stroke in the late stages of his career, which weakened the right side of his body.
While biographical evidence and paintings of the artist appear to confirm he developed a condition “that affected his ability to hold palettes and brushes to paint with his right hand”, the researchers said a stroke was not a likely cause.
Co-author Dr Davide Lazzeri, a specialist plastic reconstructive and aesthetic surgeon at the Villa Salaria Clinic in Rome, said: “Rather than depicting the typical clenched hand seen in post-stroke muscular spasticity, the picture suggests an alternative diagnosis such as ulnar palsy, commonly known as claw hand.”
He suggested a syncope, or fainting episode, could have caused trauma to da Vinci’s right upper arm.
The ulnar nerve runs from the shoulder to the finger and manages intricate movements of the hand.
“This may explain why he left numerous paintings incomplete, including the Mona Lisa, during the last five years of his career as a painter while he continued teaching and drawing,” Dr Lazzeri said.
The Mona Lisa was painted some time between 1503 and 1519, the year of da Vinci’s death.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article