Theatre
The Red Lion
Brunton Theatre, Musselburgh
Neil Cooper
Four stars
Things are stirring in the boot room in Patrick Marber’s play about the tug of love and money that exists at ground level in the so-called beautiful game. What happens on the football field may be what counts to the fans, but winning and losing is just as important behind the scenes too. This is especially the case for those in charge of non-league club the Red Lions, who already sound like socialist heroes regardless of the result, with all the inherent contradictions that entails.
The face of the old-school people’s game comes through Johnny Yates, a one-time local hero who sustains his devotion to the club ironing the players’ shirts, all the while keeping an eye out for the next golden boy. Flamboyant club manager Jimmy Kidd is also out to find stars of the future, but is only interested in making a buck on the back of selling them off to a bigger club. Both men find their dream striker in Jordan, the seemingly incorruptible ingénue who might just change both men’s lives.
By setting up such a triangle of need and greed, Marber has created a slow-burning parable of how small-time corruption can have far bigger consequences. Played out on Frances Collier’s dressing room set lined with football shirts, and with Yates and Kidd two sides of the same coin, each scene in Michael Emans’ revival for Rapture Theatre resembles a gladiatorial battle.
The speechifying, particularly between the two older men, is tinged with the poetry of veterans who once knew glory, but who have since been emasculated to the extent they both feel they have something to prove. Delivered by John McArdle as Yates and Brendan Charleson as Kidd, their sparring is invested with a combative largesse, with the ultimate prize being Harry McMullen’s initially naïve Jordan.
Clocking in at a calculated ninety minutes plus injury time, and with Pippa Murphy’s downbeat musical score lending atmosphere, Marber’s play becomes a powerful tactical game in which everybody ends up on the losing side.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here