Theatre
The Duchess (of Malfi)
Royal Lyceum Theatre, Edinburgh
Neil Cooper
Five stars
“Men will come with open faces and say anything to get inside your knickers,” says a jealous Ferdinand to the lady in red who just found her voice at the microphone in Zinnie Harris’ reimagining of John Webster’s seventeenth century revenge tragedy. The fact that the woman is the angry little man’s sister gives his own voice an edge that lays bare a desperate attempt to stamp out her autonomy alongside a terror of the lust for life she’s embraced.
All of Webster’s original plot is pretty much present and correct here, with Kirsty Stuart’s Duchess caught up in a man’s world, where, beyond her damaged siblings, her new beau Antonio has imposter syndrome, while Adam Best’s killer Bosola has serious guilt issues.
Harris’ own production for the Lyceum and Citizens theatres gives the play’s tale of a liberated woman being brutalised out of existence an extra contemporary kick. This is done in part through a use of language which undercuts its classicist steel with the phlegmatically modern rage of Ferdinand and the Duchess’ other brother, George Costigan’s abusive Cardinal.
It is done too on Tom Piper’s off-white minimalist set with devastating little moments, like when Leah Walker’s abused Julia teams up with Duchess and her maid Cariola, played by Fletcher Mathers, to form a 1960s style girl group. Oguz Kaplangi’s electric guitar score is played live by Eleanor Kane, before deathly chorales are choreographed by Kally Lloyd-Jones.
The torture scenes are as slickly stylised as a Netflix cartoon superhero show, with Jamie Macdonald’s video projections resembling a cut-up newsreel. Things take a lurch into the fantastical mid-way through the second half when the dead refuse to lie down, haunting the men who slaughtered them and watching as they destroy each other. All this is lent gravitas by an assured and stately pace as the power is claimed back in a bloody and brilliant piece of work.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel