Theatre
The Sideshow
Out of the Blue, Edinburgh
Neil Cooper
Three stars
Gentrification of major cities around the world has arguably reached crisis point, with the rise of short term lets and developers attempting to bulldoze away local communities at a global premium. With such moves particularly visible in Edinburgh just now, writer Duncan Kidd and director Gavin Crichton’s piece of allegorical agit-prop looks at the very real consequences of what is happening right now on their Leith doorstep, a stone’s throw from Out of the Blue’s art space.
This collaboration between Active Inquiry and Strange Town theatre companies alongside the All or Nothing aerial dance company sets out its store in the mythical town of Omawick, where the circus visits every year, keeping the local economy afloat. When the circus attempts to buy up everything in sight for themselves, despite initial encouragement from the mayor and her yes men and women, the local townsfolk revolt, with the result being that the circus departs forever.
Inspired by Friedrich Durrenmatt’s play, The Visit, and devised with the show’s fifteen-strong acting ensemble, five aerialists and two musicians, it’s not hard to see parallels with real life events of late. Over sixty-five rollicking minutes, the audience move in and about a performance space centred around a statue of town founder Oma, here a ukulele-playing sprite played by Megan Travers. At points they become part of the action, which shifts between various set-pieces that focus on businesses under threat, absurdist speechifying and a couple of prodigals’ returns from locals who haven’t always made good.
It’s all wonderfully utopian stuff, with the good people of Omawick taking smiley-faced and rainbow-coloured control of their own destiny. As simplistic as it might sometimes appear, Crichton and Kidd’s construction is an expression of localism in its purest form. In terms of collective action, it is also a timely summing up of where we are now, and the people power required to provide a voice that is about more than just money talking.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here