Ready Or Not (18)****
Directors: Tyler Gillett, Matt Bettinelli-Olpin
With: Samara Weaving, Adam Brody, Mark O’Brien
Runtime: 95 mins
Part horror, part comedy, and with a sprinkling of satire targeting the rich and powerful, Ready Or Not is a twisted, devilishly entertaining affair with the most single-minded of plots. On her wedding night to Alex (O’Brien), Grace (Weaving) discovers that her new husband’s wealthy family, who made their fortune from games, likes to play a deadly one - if she can remain hidden in their beautifully appointed mansion until dawn, they won’t kill her.
From this simple seed, a rattling thriller emerges, packed with shocks and dark humour, though a slight midsection lull sees a rinse and repeat structure kick in, as Grace hides a bit, gets found by someone, overpowers them, then goes into hiding again. None of this is poorly done, but it just occasionally comes off a little drab given the strength of the setup.
So with repetition proving a bit of an issue, what’s required is a crackerjack third act to get the movie back on track. It almost gets there as well, hitting some fun notes but landing just short thanks to the absence of that prime idea or killer twist. Blame an uneven script that does well to not spell things out for us in the early stages, but which isn’t quite able to follow through when it really matters.
Working in its favour is the range of characters and their different behaviours. Not everyone is pure evil, no-one is wholly good and what someone might do in a given moment is the root of many of the biggest surprises and indeed laughs, while the question marks hanging over Alex and his brother Daniel (Brody) are sure to keep audiences on their toes.
The lack of a prestige cast isn’t a major problem, so while it may have been nice to see a couple of starrier faces, everyone here is more than up to it. Henry Czerny and Andie MacDowell as Alex’s parents notch up decent chuckles, as do many of the minor players but, as is often the case with horror hits, it’s the breakout performance of the female lead that shines brightest, and the terrific Weaving carries the film with ease.
PAUL GREENWOOD
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here