The Psychology Of Time Travel by Kate Mascarenhas. Harper Collins, £10.49
What is the book about?
The book begins with four female scientists and best friends who develop a machine to time travel in 1967. All seems to be going well until one of them, Barbara, uses it on her own and has a breakdown. In 2017 Ruby, Barbara’s grand-daughter is living with her when they receive a message warning of an older woman’s death in February 2018. In January 2018 Odette finds the body of a woman at work and the book switches between each of the three time periods, linking them all together into a brilliantly clever story of time travel, relationships and psychology.
Who is it aimed at?
This is one of those books that I would recommend to absolutely anyone, as the themes and content really provide something for everyone to enjoy.
What was your favourite part?
My favourite aspect of The Psychology Of Time Travel was perhaps reading about the characters and the ways they interacted with each other. Plot is often the main focus in books based around time travel, and though the plot was prominent, none of the attention to detail in characterisation was lost which I value immensely and really enjoyed.
What was your least favourite part?
This is my favourite piece of time travel fiction but occasionally I found it rather emotionally heavy, making it all too easy to want to take a break. Once I really got into it, however, this ceased to be a problem.
Which character would you most like to meet?
I was immediately fascinated by Barbara and her presence both as a young person in the 1960s and in the modern day. She was always of interest to me, especially with the trauma she experienced.
Why should someone buy this book?
I found it to be intriguing, funny and emotional in all the right places.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here