Barber Shop Chronicles
Royal Lyceum Theatre, Edinburgh
Neil Cooper
Four stars
Men-only clubs can cover a multitude of sins. By setting his play in an international network of African-run barbershops, however, Inua Ellams taps into a world that is both intimate and social enough to foster a set of exchanges that may begin with the international language of football, but broadens out to question exactly what it means to be a man of colour in a white world.
Bijan Sheibani’s production makes a joyful song and dance of all this in a busy, bright and brash production that moves between six shops, one in London and five in different African countries. It’s April 2012, and Chelsea are about to hammer Barcelona in the Champions League semi-final. This event ramps up an already highly charged network of men and boys in need of a pre-match trim and all the cross-generational cut and thrust that goes with it.
These include the sort of conversations that go beyond matters of life and death in the game itself. In Nigeria, Uganda, South Africa, Ghana and beyond, emotive universal debates on sexuality, women, the use of the N-word, pidgin English and such-like become localised, so every street-corner incident becomes epic.
Everyday dramas, meanwhile, become similarly intensified by the close proximity of those involved. The effect is akin to something whipped up by a rap-sired Damon Runyon, with each punch-packing yarn delivered with a baroque swagger that fronts a community more vulnerable and less sure of themselves than they like to let on.
Out on tour following a run at the National Theatre in co-production with Fuel and Leeds Playhouse, Sheibani’s production is fused with an effervescent energy from its cast of twelve, who double up with abandon as they move through time-zones on Rae Smith’s magnificently cluttered set. Mohammed Mansaray brings a determined humility to Samuel, who eventually squares up Anthony Ofoegbu’s hang-dog proprietor Emmanuel. The result is as sharp as a buzz-cut in a show that’s something for the weekend and a whole lot more.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here