Nathaniel Rateliff
And It’s Still Alright
(Stax Records)
WHAT began as a side project for the Missouri singer-songwriter turned into a smart career move. Nathaniel Rateliff & The Night Sweats was a full-blown soul band whose signature tune, S.O.B., set the template for the sort of hip-shakin’ R’n’B night-out that folks used to love from Southside Johnny and the Asbury Jukes or even Vinegar Joe, back in the day. It sure was a shift from the introspective, although always melodic, songs Rateliff brought to his first gigs in Scotland, back in 2011, promoting the Memory of Loss album, his solo debut.
This new set is his first one without the big band in seven years, and it is, in some ways, a return to that earlier mood, except with fuller instrumentation — there is some lovely guitar playing in these grooves — and a more varied soundworld. Begun with producer Richard Swift and originally envisaged as documenting the collapse of Rateliff’s marriage, it changed gear when Swift’s battle with alcohol addiction ended in his early death from hepatitis and renal failure. Completing the album with songs remembering his friend, Rateliff seems to have found a spirit of celebration and optimism to leaven the melancholic tone, and created a set that recalls American classics of earlier years and the music of Simon & Garfunkel, James Taylor and Harry Nilsson.
These are songs of love lost, lost loves and a friend missed, from opener What A Drag to elegiac closer Rush On, and there is not a duff one among them. He brings a live version to the UK in April for a short tour that opens at Glasgow Royal Concert Hall on the 26th. It could be a rather special evening,
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article