Music
SCO/Emelyanychev
City Halls, Glasgow
Keith Bruce
five stars
IS it OK to admit now that I have never really understood the weight given to Wagner’s oft-quoted pronouncement about Beethoven’s Seventh Symphony being “the apotheosis of the dance”? Although the BBC SSO has yet to enter the fray with its contribution to Radio 3’s poorly-named “Unleashed” project for the composer’s 250th anniversary, elsewhere we are well into the celebrations, and younger conductors are proving there are fresh approaches to be found to that work that belie any characterisation as mere dance music.
Following Elim Chan’s stately No 7 with the RSNO, the musical dynamo that is Maxim Emelyanychev directed his chamber orchestra in a stormier reading that nonetheless shared some characteristics in its spaces, pauses and ritardandos. It followed a bustling account of the Sixth that was often far from “Pastoral” in a pairing that, curiously, blatantly contradicted the SCO’s own programme notes. In those, Cambridge University’s Martin Ennis conventionally pairs 5 and 6, as they were first performed, and 7 with 8, which the orchestra will not play until May. Amongst other revelations, Emelyanychev showed the close kinship between the dramatic storm in the Sixth and both the second and fourth movements of the Seventh.
Guest-led by Dutch violinist Marieke Blankestijn, co-leader, and a founding member of the Chamber Orchestra of Europe, this was the SCO at the very top of its game, and demonstrating once again the terrific chemistry that already exists between these players and their new Principal Conductor. It was not just in the pacing but also in the dynamics that this team can turn on a dime. The more frantic passages were balanced by some lovely languid phrasing in the wind section, both in the evocation of village life in the Pastoral and in the opening movement of the Seventh.
Having this young Russian, still at the start of a developing career, signed up for the next five years with the SCO is a very enticing prospect.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article