Failure to value the A68 "Carter Bar Panorama", often seen as the most spectacular scenic gateway to Scotland, is resulting in a "major missed marketing opportunity" according to a new survey by the Association for the Protection of Rural Scotland.
Claiming to be the first survey of its type to be based on the responses of operators rather than tourists, the report – The Economic Value Of Landscape In The Scottish Borders – concludes that "coherent management of scenic assets, cultural heritage, tourism and events programmes does not exist on the Scottish side of Carter Bar".
Citing evidence collated from local tourism businesses of the economic value of the area's "beautiful unspoiled scenery", 93% of respondents expressed interest in a joint marketing initiative to raise awareness of the area's natural assets if funding assistance were available.
According to the survey, tourism in the Teviot Valleys Special Landscape Area provides around 164 full-time equivalent jobs, a significant number in a sparsely populated rural area. It goes on to reflect strong concern at Scottish Borders Council's consideration of three large-scale wind farms, with a minimum combined total of 35 large turbines
The report said: "Approval of any one of these would set a precedent that could turn the Teviot Valleys SLA hills into a "wind farm landscape".
The survey, which received a high (64%) response rate from 57 local tourism businesses, finds that 76% of respondents found large-scale turbines "unhelpful" to marketing the area, with 69% saying they would be "unhelpful" in generating repeat business.
One-third (33%) of respondents had discussed wind farms with customers and reported negative views. Only one reported hearing support for wind turbines.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article