BANKS paid out £176 million last month in redress to small businesses who were mis-sold interest rate hedging products, taking the total pay-outs to £482m.
Of 18,800 firms in the mis-selling review, over two-thirds have now had their assessment by the banks, with 96% of sales found to be non-compliant.
So far 8,400 redress determination letters have been sent out to SMEs, but only 3,430 have accepted either full 'tear-up' (of agreement) offers or alternative products. The Financial Conduct Authority has approved no payment of redress in 962 cases. The regulator made no comment on the monthly statistics. Last month it said the banks were on track to complete the process by the end of May.
In February RBS increased its provision for mis-selling interest rate swaps from £50m to £700m and Lloyds hiked its provision from £400m to £530m. The big banks have so far provided around £3bn, and Clydesdale owner NAB has said it will be increasing its provisions.
However one adviser, Daniel Hall at All Square, said: "What these figures do not really reveal is what is fast becoming the single biggest concern for the banks involved - the issue of consequential loss. We estimate that the final bill for consequential losses could be as high as £6bn."
Campaign group Bully Banks won a ruling last November from the FCA that banks should pay out primary losses without delay, then negotiate on consequential losses.
RBS made over 700 new offers last month to take its total to 3159 while Lloyds has made 953 offers. Smaller banks account for only 775 cases in the review.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article