MPs have called on the Government to introduce legislation into the Agriculture Bill to ensure imported food products are held to current British standards as part of any future trade deal.
The Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (EFRA) Committee has published the report into its inquiry into the Bill, which is currently making its way through the legislative process.
The inquiry covered trade deals and highlighted concerns voiced by many about the "fundamental threat" to UK producers of imports produced to lower standards than permitted in the UK under future trade deals with countries like the US.
The EFRA Committee has tabled an amendment to the Agriculture Bill regarding trade stipulating that food products imported as part of any future trade deal should meet or exceed British standards relating to production, animal welfare and the environment.
In its report, the Committee calls on the Government to "put its money where its mouth is" and accept the amendment. This is particularly necessary because similar amendments to the Trade Bill have, so far, been voted down, it says.
EFRA chair Neil Parish MP said: "The UK currently has exceptionally high environmental and food standards and an internationally recognised approach to animal welfare. This legacy cannot be ripped apart by the introduction of cheap, low quality goods following our exit from the European Union.
"Imports produced to lower standards than ours pose a real threat to UK agriculture. Without sufficient safeguards we could see British farmers significantly undermined while turning a blind eye to environmental degradation and poor animal welfare standards abroad.
"Our suggested amendment calls for agricultural goods to be imported into the UK only if the standards to which those goods were produced are as high as, or higher than, current UK standards."
The Committee also looked at fairness in the supply chain and concluded that the Groceries Code Adjudicator should oversee the proposed fair dealing obligations for first purchasers of agricultural products, rather than the Rural Payments Agency.
It recommended that there should be a multiannual financial framework to provide a long-term commitment to agriculture under the transition from the EU Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) to a new system based on public money for public goods.
The MPs also expressed concern at the extent to which powers have been delegated within the Bill. "This Bill lacks clarity and gives any future Secretary of State the opportunity to avoid scrutiny and make crucial decisions while going somewhat unchallenged. We would like to see sufficient opportunities f or parliamentary scrutiny before any new policies are rolled out," Mr Parish added.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here