Womenswear chain Bonmarche has seen its shares crash after warning it could slip to a £4 million annual loss amid "unprecedented" tough trading conditions.
The group's chief executive Helen Connolly said conditions on the high street are worse than those seen during the recession sparked by the financial crisis.
Bonmarche saw shares close down nearly 45%, having opened as much as 50% lower, after it estimated the group will at best break even, but could slip to an underlying pre-tax loss of £4 million for the full year.
It said like-for-like sales are expected to fall around 12% in its third quarter and drop 1% in the final three months.
Ms Connolly said: "The current trading conditions are unprecedented in our experience and are significantly worse even than during the recession of 2008/09.
"I hope that in the fullness of time our cut to the forecast may prove to have been overdone, but in the current market this seems the appropriate stance to adopt.
"I believe that Bonmarche is well prepared to weather the storm, and that we can look forward to some recovery in full-year 2020."
Bonmarche's gloomy alert comes after it said trading during the Black Friday trading week was "extremely poor", with ongoing subdued demand despite "extensive" discounting.
It blamed Brexit for adding to the consumer woes.
"We believe that uncertainty surrounding Brexit is a significant factor affecting demand and, therefore, that it may not strengthen until the current period of heightened uncertainty ends," Bonmarche said.
Last month, the group posted a 45% drop in pre-tax profits to £2.3 million in the half-year to September 29.
Online sales were up 28.9% but store like-for-like sales fell 4% in the half-year.
Bonmarche, which had already warned over profits in September, had been hoping for a pick up in demand during and after Black Friday, assuming shoppers were delaying purchases until the November discounts.
But the bounce-back did not arrive and Bonmarche said consumer behaviour is not following last year's pattern, "nor the pattern of any year we have experienced previously".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here