NEWS that the planned merger of SSE’s retail arm with npower had been called off by the firms pleased market watchers who feared its potential impact on the household energy market and jobs.
While the competition watchdog cleared the deal, critics argued the reduction in the ranks of the big six players to five that would have resulted could not be good news for consumers.
After deciding that changes in trading conditions meant the deal no longer worked, SSE faces big challenges. The firm has made abundantly clear how badly it wants to get out of the retail business in order to focus on areas such as renewable energy generation and transmission networks.
SSE may look to sell the retail business or spin it off. But it may not be an easy task to find a buyer willing to pay an acceptable price for the retail arm or enough investors to back it as a stand-alone business.
The UK Government may be left wondering whether the decision to impose the cap on energy bills that will take effect in January will be as good for the market as it may have hoped.
SSE said the price cap was a big factor in its decision to pull out of the npower deal.
Professor David Elmes, of Warwick Business School Global Energy Research Network, noted the fact that eight energy companies have collapsed this year reflected just how hard it is to run a viable retail energy business in the UK.
He added: “These eight failures among the smaller energy retailers, plus the collapse of the SSE-npower deal, show the Government is struggling to support a sector that’s essential to the UK economy.”
Ironically, trades unions expressed concern yesterday about what the scrapping of the SSE-npower deal would mean for jobs at the firms.
“Bringing together the parts of both companies that look after residential customers was meant to secure jobs and ensure both firms had a future,” said UNISON national energy officer Matt Lay.
“Now the deal is off, employees will feel understandably anxious about what’s to become of them.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here