John Lewis staff are expected to see their annual bonus slashed this week when the department store chain unveils a sharp drop in full year profits.
The partnership, which includes upmarket supermarket Waitrose, warned in January that it might have to axe the renowned payout for the first time since 1953 as it battles challenging trading conditions.
Even if the bonus is reduced rather than axed on Thursday, it will represent the sixth year in a row that the firm's 83,000 workers have had to stomach a cut.
Independent retail analyst Nick Bubb said: "They could still afford to pay a 3% bonus - which would cost circa £45 million - but they have softened the staff up for nothing."
Outgoing chairman Sir Charlie Mayfield said in January that the board will need to consider carefully whether "payment of a bonus is prudent in the light of business and economic prospects".
Not only is the partnership coming under intense pressure as consumer confidence takes a knock from Brexit worries and higher costs, Waitrose will also next year lose its near-two decade long contract with Ocado.
It comes as the online grocer instead gets into bed with Marks & Spencer.
"We are in a very unusual economic and political circumstances. It all comes down to a judgment on what is best for the partnership.
"No one is getting rid of the bonus, bonuses go up and down. It's affordable but the board needs to decide if it's prudent," Sir Charlie said at the time.
The bonus announcement will come alongside what is set to be poor set of full year financial figures.
Numbers crunched by Mr Bubb show that the partnership could be set to suffer a 40% plunge in annual pre-tax profits to £172 million.
When accounting for exceptional items, that figure could be dragged lower still.
Mr Bubb is pencilling in a 40% fall in operating profits at John Lewis to around £140 million.
Waitrose is tipped to be a bright spot, with operating profits set to grow from £172 million to just under £200 million.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here