Fashion chain New Look has slumped deeper into the red with losses of more than £500 million after hefty writedowns and warned that trading remains "challenging".
The retailer reported pre-tax losses of £522.2m for the year to March 30, against losses of £190.2m the previous year after writing off £402m of goodwill and brand value.
But the group - which has been shutting stores under a major overhaul - saw sales falls narrow and reported an improved performance at the operating level as it posted underlying profits of £33.2m against losses of £35.7m the previous year.
It reported core like-for-like sales in the UK and Ireland down 1.6% against the 11.6% tumble seen the previous year.
Total group-wide annual revenues fell 3.8% to £1.2 billion as it shut stores and focused on more profitable sales.
READ MORE: New Look founder quits in boardroom shuffle
New Look executive chairman Alistair McGeorge said the group was making progress in its overhaul, but stressed there is "more work to do".
"Whilst New Look enters the new financial year in a fundamentally healthier and stronger position, in many respects today marks the starting line," he said.
"We have more work to do to enhance trading and deliver further operational improvements as we continue our turnaround plans."
He added: "We expect the retail environment to remain as challenging as ever in the year ahead, with continued Brexit uncertainty and unseasonable weather impacting current trading."
Mr McGeorge also admitted that the group's recent woes had affected its ability to hire new talent, although he cheered the appointment on April 1 of former House of Fraser boss Nigel Oddy as chief operating officer.
Founder Tom Singh also recently announced plans to retire at the end of June.
READ MORE: Gas sensors first used on space station launched as healthcare aid
The chain has upended its leadership team after completing £1.3 billion in debt refinancing last month as part of its turnaround plans.
It has also closed more than 80 stores as part of a Company Voluntary Arrangement (CVA) and has retrenched from overseas markets such as China and eastern Europe.
The group said it was ahead of plan with cost savings of more than £80m and was eyeing further efficiencies in the new financial year.
Carpetright has revealed the extent of the pain the retailer has faced since going through a major restructuring.
Bosses at the chain saw sales plummet 13.4 per cent to £386.4 million, although pre-tax losses improved, from £69.8m to £24.8m in the year to April 27.
However, chief executive Wilf Walsh said the Company Voluntary Agreement (CVA) in April 2018 was on track to help the firm improve its fortunes.
He told the Press Association: "It's not time to roll out the bunting just yet. It was a really, really difficult year last year but I think we've made some deep inroads.
"We did take a hit in the first half due to the publicity of the CVA.
"Customers were worried about whether we'd still be around, but we launched a campaign to say that we've been around for 30 years and hope to be around for at least another 30."
A no-deal Brexit could cost the UK car industry up to £70 million a day, according to a new report.
The Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders (SMMT) has warned that a hard exit from the EU could deliver a "knockout blow" to the sector's ability to compete.
The trade body's 2019 UK Automotive Trade Report calculates that delays to production caused by an end to frictionless trade could add up to £50,000 a minute - amounting to £70 million a day in a worst-case scenario.
It also says World Trade Organisation tariffs would amount to £4.5 billion a year for trade in passenger cars alone.
SMMT chief executive Mike Hawes said: "From an industry point of view, the prospect of a no-deal would be catastrophic."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article