A leading shareholder in UK defence company Cobham has said it plans to vote against its £4 billion acquisition by a US private equity firm.
Sanderson Asset Management, the 11th largest shareholder of the company, has put its weight behind criticism from the founding family of Cobham over the move.
Lady Nadine Cobham, whose late husband Michael ran the business, wrote to the company's largest investors last week arguing that the offer significantly undervalued the firm after a recovery over the past two and a half years.
Lady Cobham, who owns a 1.5% stake in the business, has written to Defence Secretary Ben Wallace and Business Secretary Andrea Leadsom calling on them to intervene in the buyout by US-based Advent International.
In a letter back to Lady Cobham, Sanderson said it has told the company board about its plans to vote against the deal, becoming the first institutional investor to openly oppose the move.
In the letter, Christian Paaskesen, senior portfolio manager for Sanderson, said: "We broadly agree with your assessment of the offer and are inclined to vote against it.
"We have privately communicated our position to the board along with our desire to see the current management team continue their good work in the event a better offer does not materialise."
Investors have been hoping a rival bidder will emerge to drive up the value of the business, which employs around 10,000 people, including 1,700 in the UK.
Advent International has received support for its offer to buy the company from Cobham's management as well as shareholder Artemis Investment Management.
Shareholders in Cobham have until Monday September 16 to decide on the offer, which needs support from three-quarters of investors.
Shares in the company fell 2% to 156.4p in trading on Tuesday.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here