The founder of fashion brand Superdry has been appointed chief executive on a permanent basis as his control is extended for a further 18 months.
Julian Dunkerton, who wrested back control of the boardroom after heavily criticising the previous management, will now have the extra time to push through his "design-led" overhaul.
Chairman Peter Williams said: "Julian has a clear vision and his creativity, ambition and leadership will be crucial for the turnaround of the business.
"As interim CEO, Julian has already been working closely with the team to execute this plan and, while much remains to be done, the necessary foundations are being laid."
He added that the extra time also means the pair can look for a long-term successor.
Mr Dunkerton said: "Since I have returned to the business full-time, I have been working with the team to put in place the plan that will turn around Superdry, with a focus on its design-led roots and strengthening the retail basics.
"We are already seeing early signs of progress and, while this will take time, we are excited to realise the brand's full potential."
The founder of the group brought in Euan Sutherland in 2014 as chief executive, but Mr Dunkerton was unimpressed at the new strategy and staged a coup to rejoin the board with Mr Williams by his side.
His attempts were successful and in April Mr Dunkerton returned to the board as interim chief executive.
However, the coup proved costly and led to a mass exodus, including Mr Sutherland.
Since then, Mr Williams has strengthened the board with non-executive appointments including former finance chiefs from Marks & Spencer and New Look.
Mr Dunkerton's base pay will remain at £600,000 a year, excluding any bonuses.
In July, he revealed his first set of results since returning to the group - a loss before tax of £85.4 million for the year to April 27, compared with a £65.3 million profit this time last year.
On an underlying basis, pre-tax profits dropped 56.8% to £41.9 million. Revenue was flat at £871.7 million.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here