SPORTS Direct has appointed RSM as its new auditor, ending a six-week hunt for new accountants after Grant Thornton resigned in September.
The appointment comes after the retailer scrambled to find a new auditor to avoid government intervention or possible suspension from the London Stock Exchange.
Mike Ashley's retail group will become RSM's most high-profile audit client and its first in the FTSE 350.
RSM predominantly completes audit work for private companies as well as dozens of AIM-listed firms. It said it will start work with Sports Direct immediately.
It recently also agreed to take on audit work for Patisserie Valerie, from Grant Thornton, after the company collapsed due to accounting errors.
It was reported that Sports Direct tapped up a number of mid-tier audit firms, such as Mazars and BDO, after Grant Thornton quit after 12 years auditing the retailer.
In its accounts, Sports Direct also said that all of the Big Four auditing firms claimed to be conflicted from working with the retailer.
However, Mr Ashley said that a firm outside of those four would struggle "to cope" with its audit due to the retailer's size and complexity.
Grant Thornton's resignation led to speculation that Sports Direct could become the first major UK firm to fail to appoint an auditor, meaning the Government may have been forced to step in.
Grant Thornton outlined its intention to resign shortly after Sports Direct's annual results were delayed by a last-minute 674 million euro tax demand from the Belgian authorities.
Grant Thornton has faced significant scrutiny from the audit regulator for its work with Sports Direct.
The Financial Reporting Council said it is investigating why Grant Thornton failed to disclose payments by Sports Direct to a company run by Mr Ashley's brother.
Jonathan Ericson, head of audit at RSM UK, said: "RSM is delighted to have won this opportunity. We have a strong, high-quality audit practice. Our experience, investment and commitment, together with the scope and scale of our international services, mean we are ideally placed for this important public interest appointment."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here