THE UK economy would be 3.5 per cent smaller in the long term under Boris Johnson’s Brexit deal, compared with continuing European Union membership, a leading independent think-tank is warning.
The National Institute of Economic and Social Research says it would not expect UK economic activity to be boosted by approval of Mr Johnson’s deal, which involves leaving the single market.
READ MORE: Ian McConnell: Boris Johnson acts the goat on Brexit as the grim cost keeps on rising
In its latest forecast, published today, the think-tank says the UK outlook is “clouded by significant economic and political uncertainty and depends critically on the United Kingdom’s trading relationships after Brexit”.
The NIESR adds: “We would not expect economic activity to be boosted by the approval of the Government’s proposed Brexit deal. We estimate that, in the long run, the economy would be 3.5% smaller with the deal compared to continued EU membership.”
The think-tank forecasts, on the assumption that chronic uncertainty persists but the terms of EU trade remain unchanged, that growth will be less than 1.5% in 2019 and 2020, although it notes this prediction is “subject to significant uncertainty”.
READ MORE: Ian McConnell: Anyone with first clue can see Boris Brexit deal is no reason for hope
It says risks to growth continue to be weighted to the downside, although not as much as in its previous forecast “given the reduced likelihood of a no-deal Brexit”.
READ MORE: Ian McConnell: BMW talks reality as Johnson camp veil slips to reveal truth of Brexit
The NIESR now judges there is a 15% probability of UK economic output falling in 2020, “also reflecting the risk of a more severe global slowdown”.
The think-tank noted the UK economy was estimated to be 2.5% smaller now than it would have been otherwise, as a result of the 2016 Brexit vote.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here