Analysis
By Scott Wright
ENERGY policy is shaping up to be key battle ground in the General Election campaign, which is no surprise, given Labour’s commitment to bringing some of the UK’s energy assets into state control should it come to power on December 12.
SSE has wasted no time in making its views on the matter known.
With one month to go until polling day, chief executive Alistair Phillips-Davies told journalists that not only would a process to take utility assets into state hands be disruptive and time-consuming, it would also threaten the UK’s world-class reputation for offshore renewable energy.
He also made clear the company’s satisfaction with the current direction of travel in policy terms. Its success in the Government’s Contracts for Difference scheme, he said, had allowed SSE to press ahead with a further two major offshore renewable projects: Seagreen, off the coast of Fife; and Doggerbank, which between them will represent investment of around £10 billion.
This has all been achieved against the backdrop of Brexit uncertainty, he stressed, emphasising that the task of meeting the Government’s net-zero carbon target should be trusted to the private sector, not state-owned utilities.
Not that the company is completely free from challenges on the policy front. In a separate statement yesterday, in which SSE called for political leaders to put renewables “front and centre of their plans to tackle climate change”, Mr Phillips-Davies called for a shift in policy to allow for more onshore wind farms to be developed across the country.
Elsewhere, the company still has some way to go before it realises its ambition of bringing renewable power generated on Shetland and the Western Isles to the Scottish mainland via transmission links.
While it hopes to present a fresh “needs case” to Ofgem for Shetland soon, the prospects of a Western Isles link seem to be more remote.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here