THE bumper North Sea deals announced by Premier Oil yesterday will encourage hopes the shake up in the area triggered by the oil price fall will provide a long term boost to activity.
Premier Oil in $900m North Sea expansion drive
The expectation is that the process will result in assets being put in the hands of firms that may be more likely to invest in them than their current owners.
Majors such as BP have made clear they are only interested in investing in the kind of North Sea projects on which they can generate bumper profits.
However, some smaller players including Premier reckon they can make attractive returns from investing in developments that are too small for giants.
Premier is set to pay $625m for some assets that have been in BP’s portfolio for years.
It highlighted the potential to increase total production from these by investing in projects that can extend the lives of the fields concerned and in the development of finds nearby.
RockRose plans to invest heavily in assets acquired from America's Marathon.
RockRose to ramp up spending on North Sea assets
While US giants including Marathon have exited the North Sea, BP is using some of the money raised from disposals to invest in favoured hubs in the area. These include Clair Ridge West of Shetland.
Premier’s decision to pay Dana Petroleum up to $246m for a 25 per cent in the Tolmount gas underlines the company’s confidence in the potential of a field it reckons could be in production for years.
It remains to be seen how much compensation any increase in activity arising from ownership changes will provide for the deep cuts made during the long downturn from which the industry is slowly recovering.
The recent completion of bumper projects approved before the downturn such as Clair Ridge has left a hole in order books.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here