CAIRN Energy has won strong backing from investors at a general meeting it effectively held behind closed doors because of the coronavirus.
The Edinburgh-based oil and gas firm decided that only the minimum of two shareholders required for a quorum should be allowed to attend its annual general meeting in person on the grounds of public safety.
Big hitters to lead North Sea oil and gas industry recovery effort
The decision meant shareholders could not grill chief executive Simon Thomson about the prospects for the oil and gas firm amid the plunge in oil and gas prices since March, which was triggered by the coronavirus.
In January Cairn and partners approved a $4 billion plan to develop a big find off Senegal.
However, almost 100 per cent of votes cast by shareholders in connection with the AGM approved the company’s latest report and accounts.
Investors can signal unhappiness with a company by voting against approval of its report and accounts.
Have big oil firms really got the message on climate change?
Around 9% of votes cast opposed the approval of Cairn’s directors remuneration report while 7% rejected the relevant pay policy.
More than 99% of votes cast approved the re-election to the board of Mr Thomson and Cairn’s chief financial officer James Smith.
Shareholders were able to appoint a proxy to vote on their behalves or submit votes electronically.
Around 450 million votes approved Cairn’s report and accounts with only about 6,500 opposed.
It is understood there were no objections to Cairn’s decision not to allow more shareholders to attend the AGM in person, which the company had noted was in line with government guidance.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here