Caught between the good news of US stimulus packages and a potential virus treatment, and the bad news that the pandemic might be flaring up again in China, markets seemed unsure of what to do.
UK stocks remained subdued, with the top index in London, the FTSE 100, closing the day up a fairly anaemic 0.2%, or 10.4 points, to 6,253.25.
It came a day after news from the US sent shares soaring around the world.
Late on Monday the Federal Reserve said it would start buying bonds of individual corporations, rather than just getting bonds in packages.
However a new outbreak emerged from a food market in Beijing this week, raising fears of a second wave that could tear through the country.
It has also highlighted how vulnerable other countries could be as they start re-opening the economy.
"The markets ended up striking something of a balance on Wednesday, caught between the residual positivity of Tuesday's US stimulus/steroid treatment hopes, and the realities of a potential second wave," said Connor Campbell, an analyst at Spreadex.
"Investors just couldn't quite decide where on that optimism/pessimism spectrum that sat."
European markets fared better than their counterpart in London, with France's Cac 40 leading the way with a 0.9% rise.
The Dax in Frankfurt added 0.5%, while on the other side of the Atlantic both the S&P 500 and the Dow Jones were more or less flat shortly after markets closed in Europe.
The FTSE was also pushed lower by a falling oil price, with Brent down 1% to 40.56 US dollars per barrel, cancelling out part of the benefit of a falling pound, down 0.4% to 1.2526 dollars and flat against the euro at 1.1164.
However, traders may also be hopefully looking ahead to Thursday, when the UK might announce a new stimulus of its own.
Mr Campbell said: "There may be some good news on the way for the UK index on Thursday, however, if the Bank of England extends its bond-buying programme by another £100 billion like analysts expect."
In company news, a dividend from SSE, and the news that it was going to invest more than £7 billion into renewable energy, including two new major wind farms, put the energy giant top of the pile in the FTSE 100.
Shares were up by 9.1% by the end of the day.
In a distant second place, homebuilder Berkeley reported a better than expected pre-tax profit for the latest financial year.
At nearly £504 million it was more than £28m ahead of guidance given in March.
Investors were happy, sending the shares up by more than 4% even though the profit was more than a third lower than last year.
Banknote maker De La Rue had an even better day, up 5.1% after it announced plans to raise £100m from investors, including £80m that will be funnelled into its turnaround plan.
HSBC's shares were fairly unmoved, down 0.5%, by the news that it has restarted a plan to cut around 35,000 jobs around the world that was put on hold due to the pandemic.
Boohoo shares leapt 6.6% on Wednesday as it bought collapsed clothes chains Oasis and Warehouse for £5.3 million and upped its profit outlook as lockdown trading remained strong.
And finally, there was a 6.2% boost for Kingfisher shareholders as the B&Q owner said that its like-for-like sales had increased by more than a fifth in the three months to June 13 compared to last year.
The biggest risers on the FTSE 100 were SSE, up 116p to 1,385p, Berkeley Group, up 175p to 4,397p, Aveva, up 147p to 4,084p, Meggitt, up 9.2p to 319.2p, and Just Eat Takeaway, up 186p to 7,860p.
The biggest fallers on the FTSE 100 were Carnival, down 80p to 1,275p, Legal & General, down 10.2p to 222.8p, IAG, down 9.7p to 270.5p, Aviva, down 9.8p to 278.3p, and Bunzl, down 61p to 2,088p.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here