NORTH Sea heavyweight Premier Oil has passed a milestone in its expansion plan after formalising the terms of a cut-price deal to buy into two big developments.
Premier said it had signed sales and purchase agreements with BP for the acquisition of stakes in the Andrew and Shearwater assets.
The signing of the SPA will allow Premier to lock in the benefit of reductions in the price of the assets which it secured from BP amid the uncertainty triggered by the coronavirus.
READ MORE: Fresh warning on scale of challenge facing North Sea amid coronavirus crisis
Premier agreed the deal originally in January, when it agreed to pay BP $625m cash on completion of the deal.
Following the plunge in commodity prices from March BP accepted big changes.
Premier will pay $210 million upon completion of the acquisitions and up to a further $115m depending on future oil and gas prices. Its share of the potential decommissioning liabilities has been cut to $240m from $600m.
Premier’s chief executive Tony Durrant said: “The signing of the SPAs with BP is another important milestone in completing the value-accretive BP Acquisitions which consolidates the Group’s position in the UK North Sea, one of our core areas.”
Premier expects to be able to use the cash generated from production from the Andrew and Shearwater assets to help reduce its debts. The deal will allow the firm to utilise tax losses it has accumulated.
READ MORE: North Sea heavyweight ramping up production off Shetland as oil price outlook improves
The acquisition provides evidence that some firms see long term potential in North Sea assets, but only at the right price. Premier scrapped a plan to buy an additional stake in the Tolmount gas field from Dana Petroleum, which it agreed in January.
The company has to win shareholder approval for the revised deal with BP and related funding plans.
Analysts at Arden Partners said: “We believe that the BP acquisitions stand a good chance of going through, and that this stands to benefit the (company’s) shares in the coming months.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here