THE message finally broke through to the public last week that our city centres are on the brink of serious and sustained economic damage. Thousands of jobs are at risk because commuters, shoppers and tourists simply are not there in the numbers needed to keep staff in shops, cinemas, hotels, bars and restaurants employed.
The state of play in Glasgow’s city centre is sadly no different from others. The facts are stark.
According to UK think tank the Centre for Cities, Glasgow sits alongside Edinburgh, Manchester and London in the bottom 10 amongst the 60 largest UK towns and cities for post crisis recovery in footfall. Only 60% of the activity in February, the last unaffected month before the lockdown, has been restored and February is hardly renowned as a lively month.
City centre shops are reporting around 50% of their year on year trade levels. Night-time businesses have recovered just under 50% compared to February and that is with the Chancellor’s Eat Out to Help Out campaign fully operating. Subway passenger traffic is over two-thirds below its normal August activity. Hotel bookings for September through to November are tracking at around 10% of capacity.
A Morgan Stanley report last week suggested just over 30% of UK office workers are back, significantly lagging European counterparts such as France (83%), Germany (70%) and Italy (76%). In Glasgow that figure is only 15%.
Yet another spat broke out between our two governments, this time on the appropriate policies for teasing those staff back to their desks, with an expanding gulf in attitudes on display again.
Boris Johnson is erring in favour of faster re-opening of the economy, cajoling both employers and their teams to get back to the workplace. His government has chosen to attempt to get the economy moving fast enough to avoid extensions of existing business support measures into the winter.
The Scottish Government hasn’t set a date for the re-opening of ‘non-essential’ offices. The announcement last week of joint work with the Scottish Chambers of Commerce to establish a plan for re-opening is welcome but also rather confirmed that there had been no serious attempt to consider the option before. The impression keeps on growing that the economy remains a second-tier priority.
Neither government is getting the balance right. It looks increasingly unlikely that city centre businesses will be ready for the closure of the Job Retention Scheme at the end of October, so the Chancellor must look again at further measures to help.
Continuation of a more targeted but expanded version of Eat Out to Help Out, perhaps looking again at a voucher scheme for eligible city centre shops as well as cafes, bars and restaurants would be one route. The extension of the JRS for highly exposed sectors would be another.
But the Scottish Government also has to overcome its reluctance to put the opening up of more normal business activity nearer the top of its list. Would Glasgow or Edinburgh be at the bottom of the Centre for Cities list if ‘non-essential’ offices had been cleared to operate?
The larger the city the more challenging it has been to get staff back, but we haven’t had the chance to find out.
Glasgow Chamber of Commerce has been asking for a task force to look at all the measures available to bring our city centres back to life, and a locally led task force looks to be imminent.
It would be good to see representation from both our governments on that task force, working collaboratively to save thousands of Glasgow workers from an even more miserable winter.
Stuart Patrick is chief executive of Glasgow Chamber of Commerce
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here